If people continue treating marriage as a privilege for people who fit a small set of preconditions, then I propose the following additional conditions:
a)The sum of the IQ of the two individuals must be more than or equal to 280.
b)The two individuals must have a combined annual income of at least $40,000 plus an additional $10,000 for child that is expected.
c)The two individuals must carry no dominant or recessive genes linked to any illness or disability.
d)The two individuals must undergo an extensive background check and have no recorded felonies and no more than one misdemeanor each.
e)The two individuals must undergo psychometric profiling and posses only the traits conducive to raising a family.
f)The two individuals must be virgins.
Furthermore, once two individuals are married, the government is to keep a close eye on them to make sure the following conditions are being met:
a)The two individuals must maintain their annual income.
b)The two individuals must produce children within one year of marriage.
c)The two individuals must not perform any acts of infidelity.
d)The two individuals must not be committed of of any crimes.
e)The two individuals must continue to produce the optimal number of children for the first five years of the marriage.
f)The two individuals must provide proper education for every child produced by the marriage.
Let's send that shit to court and see what happens.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Blog Archive
-
2010
(
32
)
- December ( 1 )
- November ( 3 )
- October ( 3 )
- September ( 1 )
- August ( 4 )
- July ( 2 )
- June ( 1 )
- May ( 1 )
- April ( 2 )
- March ( 3 )
- February ( 4 )
-
2009
(
17
)
- December ( 1 )
- September ( 1 )
- August ( 2 )
- June ( 1 )
- May ( 1 )
- April ( 2 )
- March ( 2 )
- February ( 2 )
- January ( 5 )
-
2008
(
48
)
- December ( 3 )
- November ( 5 )
- October ( 2 )
- September ( 2 )
- August ( 3 )
- July ( 4 )
- June ( 4 )
- May ( 6 )
- April ( 3 )
- March ( 5 )
- February ( 6 )
- January ( 5 )
Bravo! :-*
ReplyDeleteMeh.
ReplyDeleteHell yeah!
ReplyDeleteJust so you know, it is actually Maureen posting...but it won't let me post as me, apparently.
ReplyDelete